Sponsored

Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery

This is a very provocative British study that examined whether a more liberal (Hgb < 9 g/dL) versus a more restrictive (Hgb < 7.5 g/dL) transfusion threshold after cardiac surgery is associated with higher morbidity and costs.  The authors conducted a multicenter, prospective randomized trail by randomizing patients who had a Hgb < 9 g/dL after heart surgery to one of the two groups.  Over 2,000 patients were enrolled in the study.  Interestingly, the group with the more liberal transfusion protocol had no worse outcomes and no higher costs than the restrictive group.  Moreover – even more provocatively – the secondary outcome of 90-day all-cause mortality was 64% more likely to occur in the restrictive transfusion threshold group.

5 Comments

Leave a Reply

  1. This is a very strange study, as it does not answer that much.
    1) The usual target in the UK and other paces has been Hb 8g/dL. With this threshold we have been transfusing less than 10% of our patients, the only patients really needing a transfusion being small women less than 55kg. In this study there was a 54% transfusion with the 7.5g/dL threshold! We would not need to transfuse almost anyone with that limit!
    2) We have always excluded the over 80s. We already know that they do better with Hb>10. This is becoming more of an issue as the proportion of over 80s is increasing. This study does not have such a group.
    3) The results really show that limiting transfusion is not deleterious. So, why transfuse?
    4) Blood transfusion is often accompanied with other product transfusions. This needs to be detailed.
    5) I would rather see a study trying to explain how some centres manage with very low transfusions and other centres do not. I suspect local practices have a bigger role than medicine.

Log In

New to CTSNet? Sign Up